Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Lance Armstrong is not an honorable man

title or description
Go away, Lance. Just go away.

Bicyling's most famous doper, Lance Armstrong, is going to appear on Oprah Winfrey's show on Jan. 17—and what he'll say is anybody's guess. Oprah is promising a "no holds barred" interview, according to the New York Times, but I am not ready to bet he's going to utter a mea culpa about his use of performance-enhancing drugs and blood transfusions to win seven consecutive Tour de France titles—a phenomenal accomplishment, until the doping scandal broke, anyway. (In the wake of a wave of unimpeachable sources providing details about Armstrong's doping, the United States Anti-Doping Agency stripped him of his seven titles.)

This is a guy who maintained for years that he was clean. He bullied people who said otherwise, going so far as to sue a British newspaper, the Sunday Times, over allegations that he doped. He won a libel settlement of about half a million dollars. The same newspaper is now suing him for $1.5 million.

When the doping scandal broke, I shrugged my shoulders and said everybody in professional bicycling doped, so Armstrong was merely staying competitive. Back in October, one of Armstrong's teammates, Levi Leipheimer, told the New York Times that professional cycling until recently was “a sport where some team managers and doctors coordinated and facilitated the use of banned substances and methods by their riders. A sport where the athletes at the highest level — perhaps without exception — used banned substances. A sport where doping was so accepted that riders from different teams — who were competitors on the road — coordinated their doping to keep up with other riders doing the same thing.” It's worth noting that the agency that runs the Tour de France has not declared new winners for the races Armstrong won because doping was so prevalent.

But a former Armstrong teammate, Jonathan Vaughters, points out that doping doesn't give everyone the same competitive edge. He told the New York Times that a race among doped cyclists did not reward the best athlete but the best doper, because some people get a much bigger boost in their performance than others from using the same doping techniques.

Vaughters said, "If you just opened it all up and you said, ‘Let’s legalize it and it’s all fair if they all do it,’ what you would have is you would have races that were being won by people who were most physiologically adapted to the drugs that were available to them. You would not have the best athlete, who trained the hardest, who had the best team, the best strategy on the day — that athlete would rarely win. It would normally be the person whose physiology just happened to adapt to whatever biotechnology had to offer at that period in time. So it’s absolutely untrue and it absolutely applies to the generation of racing that I went through.”

Vaughters also noted that the more elite cyclists would have access to better doctors, better performance-enhancing drugs, and better techniques for doping. In addition, "There are going to be some people who are going to be willing to take much greater risks with their bodies and their health than other people.”

Armstrong's supporters maintain that even though Armstrong's reputation is in tatters, the work he's done to fight cancer with his Livestrong foundation is impressive and admirable. USA Today reported the foundation has raised nearly $500 million and has helped more than 2.5 million people fight cancer. This is true. At one point, the yellow Livestrong bracelets were everywhere. USA Today reported: "Brian Rose, who was uninsured when he was diagnosed with advanced melanoma three years ago, says he owes his health to Livestrong. 'It's overwhelming trying to do it all on your own,' says Rose, 34, who notes that Livestrong's cancer navigation program helped him get health insurance. 'Having a resource like that is priceless.'

However—and this may sound cold—without the luster of his Tour de France titles, Armstrong would not have had enough star power to make Livestrong such an impressive foundation, one able to raise millions of dollars. Do the Livestrong ends justify the means? I'm ambivalent on that one.

One thing is sure, though: Armstrong wasn't just a liar all the years he maintained he was clean. He was a cheater. He was not an honorable man. And the sooner he disappears from the public's view, the better.


( 8 comments — Leave a comment )
Jan. 9th, 2013 09:34 pm (UTC)
I have mixed feelings about the entire doping thing (regardless of sport). The stakes are enormously high for the winner in terms of fame/financial incentives. It is easy to be led astray in pursuit of those things. And the public LOVES someone who has overcome the odds (i.e. cancer). And thus far Armstrong's, only guilt is by other people who say so, which is trial without jury.

Yes, he probably IS guilty, but he was enabled by a large group of co-conspirators and the I-don't-wanna-know of the public.

None of this excuses him. But I think that sports needs to re-examine doping in general and figure out a better way to approach it/deal with dopers who win.

Someone - Roger Angell, maybe - said something along the lines of "the asterisk in sports record books is the worst addition to history."
Jan. 9th, 2013 11:13 pm (UTC)
I agree with this comment.
Jan. 10th, 2013 12:02 am (UTC)
What tipped my verdict on Armstrong was the testimony by his longtime teammate George Hincapie. Hincapie was aboard for all seven wins. He and Armstrong were as tight as tight could be, and he was respected throughout the pro bicycling community. Once Hincapie admitted that he doped, it was game/set/match in my mind.

As for fame, most people who followed the Tour during the Armstrong era would have a tough time naming a Tour winner before Armstrong came along. In Europe, that may not be true, but here? I think the sport remains relatively unknown, even though an American has won the Tour before: Greg LeMond. He won the Tour three times and was World Champion twice, but other than the fact that his name is a brand of high-end racing bicycles, I don't know anything about him. This is even though I used to follow the Tour as far back as the early '90s, when the great Michael Indurain was winning five in a row.

I don't think the doping genie can be put back into the bottle. The chemists and doctors and dopers always will be a step ahead of the people trying to catch them. But as yesterday's baseball Hall of Fame vote shows, history's verdict about dopers may be harsher than any forgiveness we're likely to give them. Maybe Barry Bonds will be Oprah's next guest.
Jan. 10th, 2013 01:41 am (UTC)
I was wondering if you'd tie this in with the baseball news. Nice post. I'm sure, as a non-athlete, it's easier said than done, but there was a time in the not too distant past that people competed and won on their own merits. Why can't we go back there? When did the scales tip in favor of fake winning? And only time will tell what all this shit does to their bodies in the long haul.
Jan. 10th, 2013 02:42 am (UTC)
"Fake winning." What a great phrase. Maybe because nobody is harmed (except themselves), athletes who dope can rationalize the means and the ends: "Everybody else is doing it ..."

Cue your mother's favorite response to that phrase.
Jan. 10th, 2013 04:08 am (UTC)
"blah blah blah, if everybody else jumped off a bridge..." that was the response in our house. In this house, I leaned more towards the, "Yeah, well I'm not everybody else's mother, I'm yours. And I say...blah blah blah"
Jan. 10th, 2013 11:11 am (UTC)
In the 60's Mickey Mantle and Whitey Ford drank their faces off and look art their performances. Owners, fans, and endorsements along with immense glorification from the public fuels this. Add narcissism and intense egoism and you have a recipe to exceed your natural gifted ability. Beware false idols!
Jan. 10th, 2013 01:23 pm (UTC)
As Jim Morrison once observed, "We are obsessed with heroes, who live for us and whom we punish."
( 8 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

March 2017

Wish I'd Said It

Nota bene: “Fear has governed my life, if I think about it. ... I always feel like I’m not good enough for some reason. I wish that wasn’t the case, but left to my own devices, that voice starts speaking up.” – Trent Reznor

“I hate to say this, but not many people care what you do. They care about what you do as much as you care about what they do. Think about it. Just exactly that much. You are not the center of the universe.” — Laurie Anderson

"The path's not yours till you've gone it alone a time." – William Carlos Williams

“Filling this empty space constitutes my identity.” – Twyla Tharp

"My definition of peace is having no noise in my head." – Eric Clapton

"The wreckage of the sky serves to confirm us in delicious error." – John Ashbery

"We are all here by the grace of the big bang. We are all literally the stuff of the stars." – Dwight Owsley

"For my part, I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of stars makes me dream." – Vincent van Gogh

"It is only with the heart that one can see right; what is essential is invisible to the eye." — Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

"Forget about being a perfectionist, because entropy always wins out in the end." – Darren Kaufman.

"Impermanence. Impermanence. Impermanence." – Garry Shandling

"Fame is a vapor; popularity an accident; the only earthly certainty is oblivion." – Mark Twain

"There is no realm wherein we have the truth." – Gordon Lish

"Actual life is full of false clues and sign-posts that lead nowhere." – E.M. Forster

“Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe." – Frank Zappa

“I try to leave out the parts that readers tend to skip.” – Elmore Leonard

“The secret of being a bore is to tell everything.” – Voltaire

• Journal title and subtitle: Ian Hunter, “Man Overboard”


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow